fair-protocol/docs/moderation/governance/defederation.md
Ipstenu (Mika Epstein) 61ccf9838d
Documentation: Proposal - Moderation in the FAIR Ecosystem (#14)
Signed-off-by: Mika Ipstenu Epstein <ipstenu@ipstenu.org>
Signed-off-by: Brent Toderash <brent@toderash.net>
Signed-off-by: Ipstenu (Mika Epstein) <Ipstenu@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Claudio Rimann <claudio@haptiq.studio>
Signed-off-by: Joe Murray <joe.murray@jmaconsulting.biz>
Signed-off-by: Ryan McCue <me@ryanmccue.info>
Co-authored-by: Brent Toderash <brent@toderash.net>
Co-authored-by: Claudio Rimann <claudio@haptiq.studio>
Co-authored-by: Joe Murray <joe.murray@jmaconsulting.biz>
Co-authored-by: Ryan McCue <me@ryanmccue.info>
2025-08-20 15:50:50 -07:00

7.6 KiB

Defederation and Removal Policy

Status Policy Document
Date 2025-01-27

Executive Summary

This document defines FAIR's comprehensive policy for removing participants, content, and services from the federation. Defederation is a serious action that affects ecosystem trust and must be conducted with transparency, due process, and clear justification.

Principles

  • Transparency: All removal decisions must be publicly documented with clear rationale
  • Due Process: Participants must have opportunity to respond and appeal before removal
  • Proportionality: Actions must be proportional to the severity of violations
  • Accountability: All decisions must be traceable to specific policy violations
  • Recovery Path: Clear requirements for reinstatement must be provided

Removal Categories

1. Content-Level Removal (Packages, Themes, Plugins)

Immediate Removal Criteria:

  • Confirmed malware or malicious code
  • Critical security vulnerabilities with active exploitation
  • Copyright violations with valid takedown requests
  • Illegal content as defined by applicable law

Graduated Removal Process:

  • Warning Level: Minor policy violations, security concerns
  • Suspension Level: Repeated violations, moderate security issues
  • Removal Level: Persistent violations, serious security issues

Required Documentation:

  • Specific violation description
  • Evidence supporting the decision
  • Date and time of removal
  • Contact information for appeals
  • Reinstatement requirements

2. Repository-Level Removal

Immediate Defederation Criteria:

  • Persistent failure to respond to security incidents
  • Repeated hosting of malicious content
  • Failure to maintain required contact information
  • Non-compliance with GDPR/CRA requirements
  • Refusal to integrate with Ozone moderation system

Graduated Defederation Process:

  • Warning (7 days): First policy violation, technical issues
  • Suspension (30 days): Repeated violations, failure to remediate
  • Defederation (permanent): Persistent non-compliance, security risks

Required Documentation:

  • Detailed violation report
  • Timeline of incidents and responses
  • Communication attempts with operators
  • Remediation requirements
  • Appeal process information

3. Aggregator-Level Removal

Immediate Defederation Criteria:

  • Failure to maintain moderation standards
  • Persistent listing of defederated repositories
  • Non-compliance with federation API requirements
  • Refusal to implement required security measures

Graduated Process:

  • Warning (14 days): Policy violations, technical issues
  • Suspension (60 days): Repeated violations, failure to remediate
  • Defederation (permanent): Persistent non-compliance

Defederation Procedures

Pre-Defederation Process

  1. Violation Identification

    • Automated detection through monitoring systems
    • Community reports via threshold escalation
    • Security incident reports
    • Policy compliance audits
  2. Investigation Phase

    • Evidence collection and verification
    • Operator notification and response period
    • Technical assessment by Security Working Group
    • Policy review by Vetting Working Group
  3. Warning and Remediation Period

    • Formal warning with specific violations
    • Clear remediation requirements
    • Timeline for compliance (typically 7-30 days)
    • Support and guidance offered
  4. Final Assessment

    • Evaluation of remediation efforts
    • Risk assessment for continued federation
    • Recommendation for action

Defederation Decision Process

  1. Working Group Review

    • Security Working Group: Technical and security assessment
    • Vetting Working Group: Policy compliance evaluation
    • Compliance Working Group: Regulatory requirement verification
  2. Decision Making

    • Consensus required among relevant working groups
    • Documentation of decision rationale
    • Timeline for implementation
    • Communication plan
  3. Implementation

    • Immediate removal from discovery services
    • Notification to all federation participants
    • Public documentation of decision
    • Appeal process initiation

Post-Defederation Actions

Immediate Actions

  • Remove from all FAIR discovery services
  • Notify connected aggregators and repositories
  • Update public defederation registry
  • Preserve evidence and documentation

Ongoing Monitoring

  • Track attempts to re-enter federation
  • Monitor for related security incidents
  • Document any new violations
  • Maintain appeal process availability

Reinstatement Process

Eligibility Requirements:

  • Demonstrated remediation of violations
  • Implementation of required security measures
  • Compliance with all federation policies
  • Successful security audit
  • Payment of any required fees or penalties

Reinstatement Process:

  • Formal application with evidence of compliance
  • Technical review by Security Working Group
  • Policy review by Vetting Working Group
  • Trial period with enhanced monitoring
  • Full reinstatement upon successful completion

Appeals and Dispute Resolution

Appeal Rights

  • All defederation decisions are appealable
  • 60-day window for appeal submission
  • Independent Appeals Working Group review
  • Right to present additional evidence
  • Right to representation

Appeal Process

  1. Submission: Formal appeal with supporting documentation
  2. Review: Independent working group assessment
  3. Hearing: Opportunity for oral presentation
  4. Decision: Written decision with clear reasoning
  5. Implementation: Immediate effect of appeal decision

Transparency and Reporting

Public Documentation

  • All defederation decisions publicly documented
  • Quarterly defederation reports published
  • Annual policy effectiveness review
  • Community feedback integration

Internal Reporting

  • Monthly working group reports
  • Incident trend analysis
  • Policy effectiveness metrics
  • Resource allocation recommendations

Emergency Procedures

Critical Security Incidents

Immediate Action Required:

  • Zero-day vulnerabilities with active exploitation
  • Confirmed supply chain attacks
  • Large-scale security breaches
  • Regulatory compliance failures

Emergency Process:

  • Immediate suspension by Security Working Group
  • Notification to all federation participants
  • Public security advisory within 24 hours
  • Formal review within 72 hours

Natural Disasters and Infrastructure Failures

  • Temporary suspension during recovery
  • Support and assistance offered
  • Gradual reinstatement upon recovery
  • Enhanced monitoring during transition

Regulatory Compliance

  • All actions must comply with applicable law
  • GDPR requirements for data handling
  • CRA requirements for security measures
  • Local jurisdiction considerations
  • Good faith immunity for policy enforcement
  • Documentation requirements for legal defense
  • Insurance coverage for legal actions
  • Professional legal review for complex cases

Implementation Timeline

Phase 1 (Immediate)

  • Policy communication and training
  • Working group formation
  • Monitoring system implementation

Phase 2 (30 days)

  • Automated violation detection
  • Warning system implementation
  • Appeal process establishment

Phase 3 (90 days)

  • Full defederation capability
  • Performance metrics implementation
  • Policy refinement based on experience

Contact and Support

TBD


This policy is subject to regular review and updates based on community feedback and evolving requirements. All changes require public comment periods and working group approval.