fair-protocol/docs/moderation/governance/defederation.md
Ipstenu (Mika Epstein) 61ccf9838d
Documentation: Proposal - Moderation in the FAIR Ecosystem (#14)
Signed-off-by: Mika Ipstenu Epstein <ipstenu@ipstenu.org>
Signed-off-by: Brent Toderash <brent@toderash.net>
Signed-off-by: Ipstenu (Mika Epstein) <Ipstenu@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Claudio Rimann <claudio@haptiq.studio>
Signed-off-by: Joe Murray <joe.murray@jmaconsulting.biz>
Signed-off-by: Ryan McCue <me@ryanmccue.info>
Co-authored-by: Brent Toderash <brent@toderash.net>
Co-authored-by: Claudio Rimann <claudio@haptiq.studio>
Co-authored-by: Joe Murray <joe.murray@jmaconsulting.biz>
Co-authored-by: Ryan McCue <me@ryanmccue.info>
2025-08-20 15:50:50 -07:00

250 lines
7.6 KiB
Markdown

# Defederation and Removal Policy
| <!-- --> | <!-- --> |
|----------|------------|
| Status | Policy Document |
| Date | 2025-01-27 |
## Executive Summary
This document defines FAIR's comprehensive policy for removing participants, content, and services from the federation. Defederation is a serious action that affects ecosystem trust and must be conducted with transparency, due process, and clear justification.
## Principles
- **Transparency**: All removal decisions must be publicly documented with clear rationale
- **Due Process**: Participants must have opportunity to respond and appeal before removal
- **Proportionality**: Actions must be proportional to the severity of violations
- **Accountability**: All decisions must be traceable to specific policy violations
- **Recovery Path**: Clear requirements for reinstatement must be provided
## Removal Categories
### 1. Content-Level Removal (Packages, Themes, Plugins)
**Immediate Removal Criteria:**
- Confirmed malware or malicious code
- Critical security vulnerabilities with active exploitation
- Copyright violations with valid takedown requests
- Illegal content as defined by applicable law
**Graduated Removal Process:**
- **Warning Level**: Minor policy violations, security concerns
- **Suspension Level**: Repeated violations, moderate security issues
- **Removal Level**: Persistent violations, serious security issues
**Required Documentation:**
- Specific violation description
- Evidence supporting the decision
- Date and time of removal
- Contact information for appeals
- Reinstatement requirements
### 2. Repository-Level Removal
**Immediate Defederation Criteria:**
- Persistent failure to respond to security incidents
- Repeated hosting of malicious content
- Failure to maintain required contact information
- Non-compliance with GDPR/CRA requirements
- Refusal to integrate with Ozone moderation system
**Graduated Defederation Process:**
- **Warning (7 days)**: First policy violation, technical issues
- **Suspension (30 days)**: Repeated violations, failure to remediate
- **Defederation (permanent)**: Persistent non-compliance, security risks
**Required Documentation:**
- Detailed violation report
- Timeline of incidents and responses
- Communication attempts with operators
- Remediation requirements
- Appeal process information
### 3. Aggregator-Level Removal
**Immediate Defederation Criteria:**
- Failure to maintain moderation standards
- Persistent listing of defederated repositories
- Non-compliance with federation API requirements
- Refusal to implement required security measures
**Graduated Process:**
- **Warning (14 days)**: Policy violations, technical issues
- **Suspension (60 days)**: Repeated violations, failure to remediate
- **Defederation (permanent)**: Persistent non-compliance
## Defederation Procedures
### Pre-Defederation Process
1. **Violation Identification**
- Automated detection through monitoring systems
- Community reports via threshold escalation
- Security incident reports
- Policy compliance audits
2. **Investigation Phase**
- Evidence collection and verification
- Operator notification and response period
- Technical assessment by Security Working Group
- Policy review by Vetting Working Group
3. **Warning and Remediation Period**
- Formal warning with specific violations
- Clear remediation requirements
- Timeline for compliance (typically 7-30 days)
- Support and guidance offered
4. **Final Assessment**
- Evaluation of remediation efforts
- Risk assessment for continued federation
- Recommendation for action
### Defederation Decision Process
1. **Working Group Review**
- Security Working Group: Technical and security assessment
- Vetting Working Group: Policy compliance evaluation
- Compliance Working Group: Regulatory requirement verification
2. **Decision Making**
- Consensus required among relevant working groups
- Documentation of decision rationale
- Timeline for implementation
- Communication plan
3. **Implementation**
- Immediate removal from discovery services
- Notification to all federation participants
- Public documentation of decision
- Appeal process initiation
## Post-Defederation Actions
### Immediate Actions
- Remove from all FAIR discovery services
- Notify connected aggregators and repositories
- Update public defederation registry
- Preserve evidence and documentation
### Ongoing Monitoring
- Track attempts to re-enter federation
- Monitor for related security incidents
- Document any new violations
- Maintain appeal process availability
### Reinstatement Process
**Eligibility Requirements:**
- Demonstrated remediation of violations
- Implementation of required security measures
- Compliance with all federation policies
- Successful security audit
- Payment of any required fees or penalties
**Reinstatement Process:**
- Formal application with evidence of compliance
- Technical review by Security Working Group
- Policy review by Vetting Working Group
- Trial period with enhanced monitoring
- Full reinstatement upon successful completion
## Appeals and Dispute Resolution
### Appeal Rights
- All defederation decisions are appealable
- 60-day window for appeal submission
- Independent Appeals Working Group review
- Right to present additional evidence
- Right to representation
### Appeal Process
1. **Submission**: Formal appeal with supporting documentation
2. **Review**: Independent working group assessment
3. **Hearing**: Opportunity for oral presentation
4. **Decision**: Written decision with clear reasoning
5. **Implementation**: Immediate effect of appeal decision
## Transparency and Reporting
### Public Documentation
- All defederation decisions publicly documented
- Quarterly defederation reports published
- Annual policy effectiveness review
- Community feedback integration
### Internal Reporting
- Monthly working group reports
- Incident trend analysis
- Policy effectiveness metrics
- Resource allocation recommendations
## Emergency Procedures
### Critical Security Incidents
**Immediate Action Required:**
- Zero-day vulnerabilities with active exploitation
- Confirmed supply chain attacks
- Large-scale security breaches
- Regulatory compliance failures
**Emergency Process:**
- Immediate suspension by Security Working Group
- Notification to all federation participants
- Public security advisory within 24 hours
- Formal review within 72 hours
### Natural Disasters and Infrastructure Failures
- Temporary suspension during recovery
- Support and assistance offered
- Gradual reinstatement upon recovery
- Enhanced monitoring during transition
## Compliance and Legal Considerations
### Regulatory Compliance
- All actions must comply with applicable law
- GDPR requirements for data handling
- CRA requirements for security measures
- Local jurisdiction considerations
### Legal Protections
- Good faith immunity for policy enforcement
- Documentation requirements for legal defense
- Insurance coverage for legal actions
- Professional legal review for complex cases
## Implementation Timeline
### Phase 1 (Immediate)
- Policy communication and training
- Working group formation
- Monitoring system implementation
### Phase 2 (30 days)
- Automated violation detection
- Warning system implementation
- Appeal process establishment
### Phase 3 (90 days)
- Full defederation capability
- Performance metrics implementation
- Policy refinement based on experience
## Contact and Support
TBD
---
*This policy is subject to regular review and updates based on community feedback and evolving requirements. All changes require public comment periods and working group approval.*